This is what the end of a free press looks like. Not a single dramatic midnight raid on a printing press, not one big headline moment you can point to and say: there. It happens in pieces. A layoff here. An arrest there. A billionaire owner quietly strangling the opinion pages of a Pulitzer Prize-winning newspaper. An algorithm choking the signal. A defense secretary at a Pentagon podium telling you that journalists who cover dead soldiers are just trying to make the president look bad — and his press secretary stepping up to confirm: yes, that is the official position of the United States government.
It happens in pieces, and then one day you look up and the pieces are everywhere.
Let us name them, one by one.
The Washington Post
In February 2025, Jeff Bezos — the richest man on earth, owner of Amazon, and owner of The Washington Post since 2013 — rewrote the mission of one of the most consequential news organizations in American history. The Post’s opinion section, he announced, would henceforth be dedicated to “personal liberties and free markets.” Viewpoints opposing those positions, he wrote in an email to his own staff, “will be left to be published by others.” Opinion editor David Shipley resigned rather than implement the new policy. Bezos replaced him with someone “wholehearted in their support” of the new editorial direction.
This was not the first signal. Just weeks before the 2024 presidential election, Bezos had personally killed the Post’s planned endorsement of Kamala Harris — breaking with decades of editorial precedent. More than 300,000 subscribers canceled in the immediate aftermath. Editorial writers quit. Cartoonist Ann Telnaes resigned in January 2025, after her editors killed a cartoon depicting Bezos and other tech billionaires genuflecting before Trump. When Bezos sat in the front row at Trump’s inauguration in January 2025, flanked by Zuckerberg, Musk, and Pichai, the picture said everything the press release wouldn’t.
The Post’s motto is “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” Its owner is now deciding, personally, what the paper is allowed to say. A senior Post economics reporter called it “a massive encroachment” and made clear that dissenting views “will not be published or tolerated.” Critics and former colleagues across the political spectrum recognized it immediately for what it was: a paper with a national audience being re-engineered into a vehicle for a billionaire’s ideological agenda — and a billionaire who had every commercial reason to stay on the right side of the administration in power.
Coincidentally, Amazon was in the middle of an FTC antitrust case at the time. Coincidentally, Amazon had just agreed to pay $40 million for rights to a Melania Trump documentary. Coincidentally, Bezos needed his Blue Origin NASA contracts to keep flowing. The appearance of conflict, Bezos had once admitted, was a genuine problem. His solution to that problem was not to divest the paper. It was to reorient it.
The paper that broke Watergate now publishes editorials about your showerhead.
The Briefing Room
On Day One of the new administration, Press Secretary Leavitt announced that the Brady Briefing Room — for decades the physical embodiment of the relationship between the presidency and an independent press — was being opened to podcasters, bloggers, and social media influencers. A seat formerly occupied by White House staff became the official “new media seat,” with the first question of the new administration going to Breitbart’s Matt Boyle. In the weeks that followed, Leavitt called on reporters from the Gateway Pundit — a site that spread lies about the 2020 election and about Georgia election workers who were subsequently threatened and driven from their homes — and from Steve Bannon’s podcast and Lindell TV, the media arm of a MyPillow CEO who has spent years and millions of dollars trying to overturn a free and fair election. “I love this guy,” Trump said at one briefing, when an OAN employee offered a compliment dressed up as a question.
This, the administration framed as inclusion. Expanding the tent. Democratizing the press room.
What it actually was: the introduction of a house press corps — loyalists and allies guaranteed to lob softballs, amplify talking points, and never once ask a follow-up about the dead soldiers or the missing Epstein files. A veteran White House reporter described watching the new arrivals with barely contained disbelief. “It’s surreal,” they said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “I never thought I’d see plants in press briefings of the highest seat of American power.”
But the administration was not finished with the briefing room. In late March 2025, the White House announced it intended to take over the seating assignments from the White House Correspondents’ Association — the independent body that has managed those assignments for over a century. The plan was explicit and the purpose was obvious: push the reporters who ask hard questions to the back of the room, where they are harder to see and easier to ignore. Elevate the outlets that produce favorable coverage. Make the visual language of access into a daily performance of who is rewarded for compliance and who is punished for doing their jobs. The WHCA pushed back immediately: “The reason the White House wants control of the briefing room is the same reason they took control of the pool: to exert pressure on journalists over coverage they disagree with.”
The Pentagon
In February 2025, the Defense Department — now led by a man who spent the previous decade as a Fox News host and had never held a position of executive authority in his life — announced a new “Annual Media Rotation Program” for the Pentagon’s press corps. The announcement arrived on a Friday night with no individual notification to the affected outlets and a note that “no additional information will be provided at this time.”
The outlets rotated out: NBC News. The New York Times. NPR. Politico. Then, in a second wave after journalism organizations objected: CNN. The Washington Post. The Hill. The War Zone.
The outlets rotated in: Breitbart. One America News. The New York Post. The Daily Caller. The Washington Examiner. The Free Press — Bari Weiss’s publication, which Bezos’s son David would later purchase for $150 million before being installed at the helm of CBS.
Fox News, where Hegseth had worked for a decade, kept its office space. Nobody rotated Fox.
Career defense officials noted immediately that there was, in fact, enough space in the Correspondents’ Corridor to accommodate all the outlets without removing anyone. The rotation was not about space. Former Pentagon Press Association vice president Kevin Baron called it plainly: “the erasure of journalism at the Pentagon.”
What followed made the intent undeniable. Hegseth’s office closed the Pentagon press briefing room to regular briefings. It restricted wireless internet access — meaning reporters who had been stripped of their workspace also had fewer places to file stories from inside the building. At press briefings on the Iran war, Hegseth called almost exclusively on the MAGA-aligned outlets seated in the front rows. The legacy press corps, decades deep in Pentagon beat knowledge, sat in the back and was ignored. The Pentagon then barred press photographers from some briefings entirely — after photographers published photos of Hegseth that he apparently found unflattering.
On March 21st, 2026 — yesterday — a federal district judge ruled that the Pentagon’s press pass restrictions were unconstitutional. Senior U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman wrote that the policy amounted to “viewpoint discrimination” — specifically, barring outlets based on “whether the individual or organization is willing to publish only stories that are favorable to or spoon-fed by department leadership.” The New York Times, which had challenged the policy in court, called it a front-page victory. The administration can appeal.
They probably will.
The Associated Press and the Name of the Water
In January 2025, on his first day back in office, Trump signed an executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America. The order applied only to U.S. federal agencies. It had no authority over international bodies, foreign governments, or private news organizations. The Gulf of Mexico has been called the Gulf of Mexico since the 1550s.
The Associated Press, whose stylebook is used by thousands of news outlets worldwide, announced it would use “Gulf of Mexico” while acknowledging the new name in its coverage. This is what journalists call standard practice. The White House called it misinformation.
On February 11th, 2025, an AP reporter was blocked from the Oval Office. Then another. Then from Air Force One. The administration banned the AP — the oldest and largest wire service in the country, present in the White House press pool for more than a century — from the most intimate spaces of presidential coverage. The stated reason: three words. Gulf of Mexico. Trump was explicit: “I’m going to keep them out until such time that they agree it’s the Gulf of America.”
White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles wrote to AP Executive Editor Julie Pace that the AP’s editorial choice “denies the appropriate authority of the duly elected President.” Leavitt told reporters from the briefing room podium: “It is a privilege to cover this White House. Nobody has the right to go into the Oval Office and ask the president of the United States questions.”
Let that land. The press secretary of the United States said, out loud, that access to the presidency is a privilege dispensed by the administration — not a right, not a democratic function, not a public accountability mechanism — a privilege, granted and revoked at the pleasure of the person being covered. Pace put it in the Wall Street Journal in late March: “For anyone who thinks the Associated Press’ lawsuit against President Trump’s White House is about the name of a body of water, think bigger. It’s really about whether the government can control what you say.”
A federal judge eventually ruled in the AP’s favor. The administration appealed. An appeals court partially stayed the ruling. The case is still moving through the courts.
The CBS Erasure and the Architecture of Capture
On March 20th, CBS News announced it was laying off roughly six percent of its staff and shutting down CBS News Radio entirely — ending a nearly hundred-year-old broadcast institution that put Edward R. Murrow’s voice on the radio from London during World War II, that carried Walter Cronkite, that served 700 affiliate stations across the country. Gone. Every position eliminated, effective May 22nd, 2026. The overhaul is being driven by new editor-in-chief Bari Weiss — personally installed after David Ellison’s Skydance acquired Paramount and purchased Weiss’s digital outlet, The Free Press, for a reported $150 million. This is the second round of CBS News layoffs since the acquisition. It will not be the last.
And in case there was any ambiguity about what is coming next: Kegsbreath stood at the Pentagon podium on March 13th and made his administration’s wishes explicit. He attacked CNN’s war coverage, proposed his own preferred headline, and said: “The sooner David Ellison takes over that network, the better.” This was not a slip. The Secretary of Defense of the United States, at an official press briefing, expressed open enthusiasm for a friendly billionaire acquiring the last major independent cable news network. His press secretary confirmed the sentiment. Laura Loony Loomer said she’d love a spot on CNN once the right people are in charge.
This is what capture looks like before it completes. Paramount — CBS’s parent company — is now in negotiations for an $111 billion merger with Warner Bros. Discovery, which owns CNN. David Ellison, whose father Larry controls the algorithm on TikTok’s U.S. platform following that sale to a majority-U.S. investor group with Oracle, will control CBS and CNN simultaneously pending regulatory approval. The administration that has been openly hostile to the independent press for two years is the administration that will decide whether that merger goes through.
Fox News, where Hegseth worked, kept its Pentagon desk. Fox is owned by Rupert Murdoch, whose son Lachlan — in a 2016 alliance of convenience — aligned the network with Trump. That alliance has never wavered.
The Suppressed Signal
After the TikTok sale, users began reporting that content critical of the Trump administration and ICE was being flagged as ineligible for recommendation or disappearing entirely. California Governor Gavin Newsom opened a formal investigation into whether TikTok was violating state law by suppressing Trump-critical content. Celebrities with large platforms confirmed they were experiencing it. Independent creators reported account suspensions. The word “Epstein” was blocked in direct messages. The same week the administration was demanding that the press cover its preferred narrative on Iran, the algorithm was quietly turning down the signal on anyone saying otherwise.
The Arrests, The Deportations, The Erasure
On January 30th, Attorney General Bondi ordered the arrest of Don Lemon and independent journalist Georgia Fort for covering an anti-ICE protest at a church in St. Paul. A federal magistrate had already rejected the warrant once. A federal district judge had refused to overturn it. The Eighth Circuit denied a third attempt. The administration arrested them anyway — pulling Lemon in Los Angeles in the middle of the night. Independent journalist Mario Guevara spent 110 days in detention before being deported to El Salvador for covering immigration raids in Atlanta. An ICE agent physically pushed reporter Dean Moses off a public elevator at 26 Federal Plaza in New York while Moses tried to photograph an arrest. The United States now ranks 57th in the world on the Press Freedom Index — its lowest recorded score.
The State Department ordered all official government posts on X published before January 20, 2025 to be deleted from public view. The pre-Trump government simply ceases to exist online.
The State Department also issued guidance threatening visa denials, revocations, and deportation for noncitizen fact-checkers, trust and safety researchers, and social media analysts — framing their professional work as complicity in “censorship of Americans.” The chilling effect is the point. The message to anyone doing this work is simple: we know who you are, and we can reach you.
What This Is
There is a name for a media environment in which major news organizations are owned by allies of the ruling government, in which coverage is adjusted to avoid friction with power, in which the briefing room fills with loyalists, in which the Pentagon evicts the institutions that ask hard questions and installs the ones that don’t, in which journalists are arrested and deported, in which the algorithm quietly turns the volume down on dissent, and in which the Secretary of Defense stands at an official podium and tells the surviving press corps that reporting the names of dead soldiers is an act of political warfare against the president.
That name is state media. The defining feature is not that the government writes the scripts. It is that the journalists learn, without being told twice, what scripts will be tolerated.
We are not there yet. We are close enough to read the sign.
Unfugginbelievable is a teeny tiny corner of the internet. We have not gone viral. We are not on anyone’s shortlist. We are not waiting to see which way the wind blows before we decide what we think is true. We have no corporate owner, no advertisers, no merger pending with anyone, no government contracts to protect, and no interest in being told what the water is called.
We are going to keep publishing the truth. That is the whole job. That has always been the whole job.
The record belongs to all of us. We are keeping it.
Add comment
Comments