Jeanine Pirro has once again launched herself at the justice system like a malfunctioning bottle rocket, and once again the grand jury responded with the legal equivalent of “girl, go home.” This time, she tried to indict six lawmakers - five veterans and one constitutional lawyer — for the unspeakable crime of reminding U.S. service members that they are not required to follow illegal orders. That’s it. That’s the whole plot. They said the thing every recruit learns in basic training, every JAG officer teaches, and every post‑Nuremberg legal framework is built on. But because Grandpa Gaslight got his emotional Spanx in a twist that someone dared to say the military cannot be used as his personal errand squad, the DOJ once again sprinted out like a panicked maître d’ trying to appease the world’s angriest Yelp reviewer.
And the six Pirro tried to drag into her fantasy prosecution? Not fringe activists. Not chaos agents. Not people who learned civics from memes. These are people with actual résumés, actual service records, and actual understanding of the oath they took — which is more than can be said for the woman who has turned shouting legal jargon into a performance art piece.
Mark Kelly, Navy combat pilot, astronaut, and senator from Arizona, said the chain of command only works when it’s tethered to the law, not to the emotional weather patterns of a single man. Elissa Slotkin, former CIA officer and Pentagon official, now senator from Michigan, said the oath is to the Constitution, not to a personality cult, and that refusing illegal orders is literally part of that oath. Jason Crow, Army Ranger with tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, said blind obedience is how atrocities happen and that troops have a duty — not a suggestion, a duty — to refuse unlawful commands. Mikie Sherrill, Navy helicopter pilot and former federal prosecutor, said this is not radical, it’s military law 101: follow lawful orders, refuse illegal ones, full stop. Ruben Gallego, Marine Corps veteran who fought in Fallujah, said the message was about protecting rank‑and‑file troops from being turned into political weapons or scapegoats. And Maggie Goodlander — New Hampshire’s own, constitutional lawyer, former DOJ official, and the only one of the six who has had to explain this to reporters while standing on her own damn home turf — said the quiet part out loud: the military is not a personal enforcement squad for any president, and the oath is the guardrail that prevents that.
These are not seditionists. These are not rebels. These are not people plotting a coup. These are people who have actually read the rules, lived the rules, and in several cases risked their lives defending the rules. But Pirro, in her eternal quest to turn every civic norm into a Fox‑era morality play, decided that reminding troops not to commit crimes was somehow a felony. And the DOJ — now operating like a nervous intern terrified of disappointing a man who thinks the Constitution is a Cheesecake Factory menu — actually entertained it.
And then, predictably, the grand jury laughed her out of the room. This is not new territory for Pirro. This is the same woman who once tried to bring a case so legally incoherent that the judge asked if she was feeling alright. The same woman who launched a corruption probe that collapsed before opening arguments. The same woman who managed to botch a high‑profile investigation so thoroughly that even her own office quietly pretended it never happened. If there is a way to fumble an indictment, she has done it. If there is a way to embarrass herself in front of a judge, she has pioneered it. If there is a way to turn a straightforward legal process into a slapstick routine, she has perfected it.
And yet here we are again, watching the DOJ contort itself into a pretzel because Grandpa Gaslight got mad that six people said words he didn’t like. It is not normal for a Justice Department to behave like this. It is not normal for prosecutors to chase political grudges like overcaffeinated mall cops. It is not normal for the machinery of federal law enforcement to activate every time the president gets emotional indigestion. This is not how a functioning democracy behaves. This is how a banana republic with a Wi‑Fi budget behaves.
The six lawmakers walk away unindicted, unbothered, and constitutionally correct. Pirro walks away with yet another self‑inflicted bruise on her already battered reputation. And the DOJ walks away looking like the world’s saddest concierge service, desperately trying to anticipate the whims of a man who thinks “illegal order” is just a suggestion he can override with enough yelling.
Somewhere out there, a ham sandwich is still breathing a sigh of relief knowing Jeanine Pirro will never be able to lay a glove on it.
Add comment
Comments