There are historic days, and then there are days like this — when the universe decides it’s done waiting for institutions to grow a spine and instead personally drags a centuries‑old monarchy into the 21st century by the collar. Andrew Mountbatten‑Windsor, the man who once claimed he couldn’t sweat, the man who thought a photograph could be bullied out of existence, the man who spent years insisting he was merely “unfortunate” in his friendships, just became the first sibling of a sitting British monarch to be arrested since the 1500s. And not in the American “wealthy predator schedules his own surrender between brunch and a donor call” way. No. British police rolled up to Sandringham, walked through the door, and took him into custody on suspicion of misconduct in public office tied directly to the Epstein files. They cuffed a royal on his birthday. The last time this happened, people were writing with quills and dying of the plague.
And while the police were doing their job, King Charles released a statement so straightforward it should make every U.S. official spontaneously combust from shame: he expressed his “full and wholehearted support and co‑operation” with law enforcement and said “the law must take its course.” Imagine that. A head of state not interfering, not whining about witch hunts, not demanding special treatment for his brother, not calling the cops “unfair,” not trying to negotiate a private entrance. Just: do your job. Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Justice is still treating the Epstein files like they’re the nuclear launch codes, the Dead Sea Scrolls, and the last Horcrux all rolled into one.
Virginia Giuffre’s brothers released a statement calling Andrew’s arrest “long overdue” and saying survivors “deserve to see every man who participated in Epstein’s abuse held to account, no matter their title, wealth, or connections.” That’s what moral clarity sounds like. Not whatever the DOJ has been doing — which is somewhere between bureaucratic mime and obstruction cosplay.
And while America is still redacting victims’ names while leaving the powerful untouched, the rest of the world has been doing something wild: acting. France, for example, didn’t just shrug and say “move on.” They opened investigations, raided properties, and publicly named high‑profile figures tied to Epstein. Jean‑Luc Brunel, the modeling agent long accused of trafficking minors, was arrested at Charles de Gaulle Airport while attempting to flee; he later died in custody, but not before French authorities confirmed they were investigating allegations of rape and trafficking. Former French science minister and Nobel laureate Jean‑François Bach was publicly scrutinized after his name appeared in Epstein’s address book, prompting calls for inquiry. Even former French president Nicolas Sarkozy faced public questions after his name surfaced in Epstein’s contact lists — not accused of crimes, but forced to answer publicly because France, unlike the U.S., doesn’t treat the powerful like an endangered species. When French prosecutors announced their investigations, they said they were pursuing “all possible links” and “no one is above scrutiny,” which is the kind of sentence that would cause half of Washington to faint.
Spain and Italy followed suit. In Spain, former government officials and business leaders whose names appeared in Epstein’s travel logs were publicly questioned by the press and by lawmakers demanding transparency. Italy saw high‑profile resignations in the finance and tech sectors after journalists uncovered previously unknown meetings and correspondence with Epstein. Germany opened inquiries into business leaders and academics who had accepted funding or traveled with Epstein, with one Bundestag member saying, “We cannot pretend this was an American problem. This was an international network, and Germany will not look away.” Imagine hearing that from a U.S. official. You won’t, because here the official line is: “Time to move on.”
But nothing captures the global fallout quite like the Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem scandal. Lawmakers reviewing the unredacted Epstein files identified him as the recipient of Epstein’s 2009 email referencing a “torture video,” a message so grotesque it should have triggered alarms in every intelligence agency on Earth. Bin Sulayem wasn’t some random guy in Epstein’s inbox — he was the chairman and CEO of DP World, one of the most powerful logistics companies on the planet, a man Epstein described as one of his “most trusted friends.” The DOJ had originally redacted the name, but Representative Thomas Massie publicly identified him after reviewing the unredacted files, saying, “A sultan seems to have sent this,” and urging the DOJ to make it public. Once the name was out, the consequences were immediate. Bin Sulayem was ousted as chair of DP World after the disclosures, ending a four‑decade reign during which he built the company into a global powerhouse. Investors froze partnerships. International media dug into his years of correspondence with Epstein — emails mixing business, politics, and crude sexual remarks, including the infamous “torture video” reference. No criminal charges have been announced, but the public disgrace alone detonated his career.
And then there’s the United Nations, which has done something the U.S. government seems allergic to: calling things what they are. UN human rights experts have said Epstein’s trafficking network may constitute crimes against humanity, because — and this is apparently controversial in the U.S. — trafficking minors across borders for the pleasure of the global elite is not just “bad optics,” it’s a human rights atrocity. When the UN announced its inquiry, one official said, “This was not the work of one man. This was a system, and systems require accountability.” Meanwhile, the DOJ is still clutching the Epstein files like a Victorian widow clutching her pearls, terrified that if the public sees the truth, the entire American power structure will collapse under the weight of its own rot.
Andrew’s arrest is a global earthquake, not because he’s the worst of them — he isn’t — but because it proves something the U.S. government desperately wants you to forget: power is not an impenetrable shield. It’s only treated like one here. Britain just arrested a royal. France has arrested businessmen and raided properties. Spain and Italy have forced resignations. Germany has opened inquiries. The UN is talking about crimes against humanity. The UAE just watched one of its most powerful businessmen get publicly named and toppled. Around the world, the only “moving on” is to the next page to see what fresh horror the files reveal. No one is looking away. No one is pretending this is over. No one is telling survivors to be quiet for the sake of “stability.”
And the United States? The DOJ is still hiding the receipts. Still redacting victims while shielding predators. Still pretending that if they stall long enough, the public will get bored and wander off.
A royal is in custody. A global CEO has been toppled. Countries around the world are naming names, opening investigations, and treating Epstein’s network like the international criminal enterprise it was.
No wonder theRAPIST-in-chief wants us to move on, accountability is terrifying.
Add comment
Comments